![]() You complain that the plot section containing mentions about the music is not adequate for the plot section, which is a fair point to make.Why do you insist on belaboring it? - The Old Jacobite The '45 12:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC) So, let's recap: ![]() Diego ( talk) 07:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC) I have already stated, more than once, that whether or not K dies is a minor point, which is left vague in the film. If you don't want it included in the plot as a simple and short statement, I'm waiting to see how you deem acceptable to cover it. The number of references are there to prove the level of coverage, showing that it is not a minor point in the plot as you think, with several of them dedicating a whole stand-alone article to the ending alone so it should be covered in the article per WP:DUEWEIGHT. This is precisely what is going on: the death may result vague as you said in a first watching, but the author has confirmed it and several reliable sources confirm that it happens, with at least to of them saying it explicitly. Relevant section in the manual of style which explains why to include the point using references: If a vague plot element is later clarified by the work's creator, this can be included in the summary as long as a citation to this clarification is provided, together with sources covering the plot point with "correlation with the creator". ![]() TheOldJacobite, in my edit comment I linked to the ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |